Physiol. Genomics AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Genomics (May 27, 2008). doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.90207.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/3/243    most recent
90207.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandillo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wurst, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandillo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wurst, W.
Submitted on April 2, 2008
Revised on May 20, 2008
Accepted on May 23, 2008

Reliability, Robustness and Reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study

Silvia Mandillo1, Valter Tucci2, Sabine M Holter3, Hamid Meziane4, Mumna Al Banchaabouchi5, Magdalena Kallnik3, Heena V Lad2, Patrick M. Nolan, Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal4, Emma L Coghill2, Karin Gale5, Elisabetta Golini1, Sylvie Jacquot4, Wojtek Krezel4, Andy Parker2, Fabrice Riet4, Ilka Schneider3, Daniela Marazziti1, Johan H. Auwerx6, Steve D. M. Brown7*, Pierre Chambon, Nadia Rosenthal5, Glauco Tocchini-Valentini1, and Wolfgang Wurst3

1 CNR
2 MRC
3 GSF
4 ICS
5 EMBL
6 Institut de Gtique et Biologie Mollaire et Cellulaire
7 MRC Harwell

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.brown{at}har.mrc.ac.uk.

Establishing standard operating procedures (SOPs) as tools for the analysis of behavioural phenotypes is fundamental to mouse functional genomics. It is essential that the tests designed provide reliable measures of the process under investigation but most importantly that these are reproducible across both time and laboratories. For this reason, we devised and tested a set of SOPs to investigate mouse behaviour. Five research centres were involved across France, Germany, Italy and the UK in this study, as part of the EUMORPHIA program. All the procedures underwent a cross-validation experimental study to investigate the robustness of the designed protocols. Four inbred reference strains (C57BL/6J, C3HeB/FeJ, BALB/cByJ, 129S2/SvPas), reflecting their use as common background strains in mutagenesis programmes, were analysed to validate these tests. We demonstrate that the operating procedures employed, which includes open field, SHIRPA, grip-strength, rotarod, Y-maze, pre-pulse inhibition and tail flick tests, generated reproducible results between laboratories for a number of the test output parameters. However, we also identified several uncontrolled variables that constitute confounding factors in behavioral phenotyping. The EUMORPHIA SOPs described here are an important start-point for the ongoing development of increasingly robust phenotyping platforms and their application in large-scale, multi-centre mouse phenotyping programmes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.